|
Notes from below sea level…
|
|
A small milestone was passed on 17 June that is worth pulling out of the media dustbin. A court in Rotterdam sentenced five Somali pirates to five years each for the failed attempt to board the container ship Samanyolu on 2 January in the Gulf of Aden. At that moment the Netherlands became the first Western land to judge and sentence the Somali scourge of the seas for a couple of centuries. Irrelevant? Hardly. The fact that it has taken so long for a Western legal system to take such a case on speaks volumes for the difficulties in agreeing on who should (or can) do what to whom in this field. The judge literally said that pirates picked up are often released because no-one wants to take the responsibility to put them on trial. The chances that the defendants claim asylum once they exit prison are high. The Dutch proposal for a special piracy tribunal has gone nowhere. But something needed to be done to break the impasse, considering the piracy issue has been seriously bubbling away since at least 2008. So the process to get them in front of a Dutch judge took longer than usual – it took forty days before they were actually indicted. Will the case solve the problem of what kind of law is required to take on the pirates? Possibly, but it could just open up new problems as well. The signs would first appear to be that obstacles were overcome to allow the Netherlands to take on this new role in international law. The navy that pisked them up was Danish, after all – but the ship was Dutch. Well, not exactly – Dutch Antillean, from the Caribbean. But as it was the Netherlands and not the Antilles that signed the UN Law of the Sea, and the Antilles are still part of the Dutch Kingdom, this small technical detail could be overcome. Ever onwards to setting a precedent. But the Rotterdam court spoke out otherwise. It was not necessary for the Netherlands to try all captured Somali pirates. Caution is wise here, otherwise every navy active in the Gulf of Aden will ship its captives off to the Netherlands and let the Dutch work it out. The idea for a piracy tribunal was that it would be located somewhere in the region of Somalia exactly to avoid this scenario. So if there is no reasonable Dutch interest involved, its still Somebody Else’s Problem. Nevertheless, the message is clear. If necessary, a regular court can take this kind of case on. Victory for the state prosecutor’s office that decided to go this path. Victory for imposing the rule-book that says piracy is a serious crime that comes with a heavy prison price-tag. Victory for those who constantly push the Netherlands as the pioneer state in international law. Victory for a civilised process, as opposed to the Yemeni court that sentenced six Somali pirates to death back in May. And surely victory for the pirates, who in all likelihood won’t be sent back to Somalia after they are released, and who could have access to the Netherlands via an asylum application. The idea of this case actually repelling future piracy was therefore largely ignored. Highly likely that it will lead to a rush on Dutch ships going through the Gulf of Aden. |
Re the story “Another Legal Milestone”.
Why not append to any such law that no-one convicted of piracy can claim assylum. Or is that too obvious?